1st December 2010
We have been busy bees over the last few months.
Posted by: David
Links: Branding, Editorial, Identity
27th July 2010
(We) don’t think paper will disappear in our lifetime. We do need to get smarter in the way we use it, we need to look to technology for new alternatives (paper is already being made from stone and carbon nanotubes). We should leave the trees to do their job of helping to keep the planet alive. Paper is clearly still very important.
As far back as 1975 it was thought that the introduction of email would reduce the amount of paper usage in offices but a recent study from Fujitsu Siemens Computers, found that the the average UK worker prints off 22 pages every working day, accounting to an equivalent paper mountain over 8,000 miles annually. ![]()

When we find our interaction with paper influencing technology, from the web ‘page’ to through to the iPhone we are reminded about the simple power and possibility that a piece of paper represents.
The Pulp Paper book is featured on the Design Museum website as one of their “best books”: www.designmuseumshop.com/whats-new/pulp-paper
Kentlyons blog: www.blog.kentlyons.com/
Posted by: Sophie
Links: Concepts, Designers, Editorial, Papers
24th June 2010
A small green shoot in an otherwise anxious economic time: In the small town of Baikal in Siberia a transformation takes place. Where once stood the Baikal Pulp and Paper Mill belching foul-smelling sulphates into the air and chlorides, phenols and other chemicals into the lake now grows a blossoming tourism industry. The ecologists had failed to get the factory shut down but the global recession succeeded. Other examples exist: the number of small steel mills that closed their doors in India caused an 85% drop of sulphur dioxide (falling as acid rain) in the atmosphere and last year the reduced economic activity was projected to cut Europe’s emissions of carbon dioxide by 100 million tonnes. (Begley, The Recession’s Green lining, newsweek Mar 2009)
Obviously economic recession is not a long-term environmental strategy. The challenge is to re-engineer what survives and re-invent the new, so that when the economy revs up it’s not back to polluting business as usual.
This is what comes to mind when I hear the phrase ‘never waste a good crisis’ (which seems to be quite a fair bit at the moment). I reckon that if necessity is the mother of invention then design is the industry of invention. We are trained to find those ingenious ways to help solve the hardest of challenges. We really should stop being so detail focused for a moment and collectively set about solving these big global issues.
If you open your eyes to the real impact of our industry and take a look around your studio, your house, your life you will see that design lies at the heart in much of our everyday choices. Step back through the chain of suppliers, before this stuff hits the shelves – through manufacturers, corporations, decision-makers – you will find the impact in material, energy, water and waste were determined right at the design and concept stage and therefore most probably by a designer.
Some industries like the vehicle industry have become much more efficient in their design of a better car (but in the same period our car use has increased globally). And in areas where products are directly accountable for using or emitting pollutants there has been improvement. Other positive impacts have come from Legislation. The waste disposable push from Europe through the WEEE directive and increasing landfill taxes and have forced alternative thinking on a product’s after life. There are now a growing number of new Management systems that focus on sustainability and the debate still rages on about obligation or peer pressure. If people aren’t driving it then legislation must impose it.
Too many clients are still wedded to the system of selling as much product as possible as this is still how we calculate profit and growth. There seems to be an obligation for designers to accept commercial rationale to create such objects though clearly we must find ways to make sure that such processes create environmentally benign stuff.
The focus on resource depletion and challenge of material efficiency is an increasingly exciting area. Recent documentaries have highlighted some extraordinarily resourceful communities in Lagos and Mumbai slums that we would do well to learn from. These people show creativity and inventiveness whilst eking out a living from the stuff thrown out by the rest of society. Not Utopian in any means but resourceful and incredibly efficient.
There is also some fantastic innovation going on in R&D with regards to disassembly and recovery of resources. It seems crazy to me that some designers still do not understand the consequences of their decisions that are sometimes purely concerned about aesthetics. Simple things like co-molding two different plastics together in a toothbrush design or laminating a piece of paper can predetermine its painful and slow landfill demise. This will be where new alliances for designers, waste and materials industry can flourish.
Inevitably as oil prices keep rising and with the much predicted peak oil (the point in time when the maximum rate of global extraction is reached, after which the rate of production enters terminal decline) materials and resources will become ever more expensive pushing further the drive for more environmental efficiency.
Mike Pitts from the Chemistry KTN talked at greengaged in 2008 about other ‘peaks’ in mined materials. He presented a memorable slide of the periodic table – a visual representation of every known element on the planet – showing how, if we continued using and designing without easy (and safe) disassembly and recycling we would banish a big chunk of these essential building blocks to landfill very soon (very soon being 5–10 years in some instances).
So there is need for more responsibility in the way we choose materials and a wider outlook for new opportunities to turn waste into someone else’s raw material. But responsibility does not mean boring. What designers can bring to the party is much more than a reactive approach.
What’s fascinating about sustainability is that it’s fundamentally a value system characterised by reducing and eradicating environmental impact in much the same way that nature does. Taking generic principles like efficiency, non-pollution, whole life design, dematerialisation - one can use them in any area of design. The more creative and more ingenious we are – the quicker and bigger the positive environmental paybacks.
As a final thought I should really mention cost. Everyone always asks about costs. Doesn’t it cost more to produce something more sustainably? Clients don’t want to pay or pass on any extra; designers don’t want to give others the competitive advantage.
The reality is that none of this impact is accounted for, like a lost number in the mother of all excel spreadsheets. Even if you are a hard climate sceptic you cannot get away from the consequences of our excess this planet is now coping with and the role we are unwittingly playing.
Posted by: Sophie
Links: Concepts, Editorial, Talks
15th March 2010
The Cultural Leadership Programme’s list of ‘Women to Watch’ has been launched with fifty of the most ambitious and talented women in the UK cultural and creative industries.
Sophie has been recognised as one of the most talented and ambitious women in the UK cultural and creative industries, after being included on the Cultural Leadership Programme’s national list of ‘Women to Watch.’
The inaugural list has been established to profile the incredible achievements of 50 talented women leaders, including Sophie who will have a huge impact on the cultural life of the UK in years to come.
These women are already making a significant contribution to industries including design, libraries, literature, museums, heritage, music, performing and visual arts, the historic environment and creative businesses and have the potential to become influential and established senior leaders in the sector within the next few years.
“Sophie will continue to be a leading figure in design, in particularly in the critical area of sustainability, helping designers to understand their role and responsibility in developing products and services that are more environmentally, socially and economically sustainable”
“For me, building a successful design business has never been focused on creating enough profit to be able to buy myself a yacht,” says Sophie. “Like many female headed practices we are powered by passion and drive to build up benefit for all. It is therefore great to be recognised for this and I am enormously proud of all our achievements”.
As well as celebrating talented women within the sector, the list has also been established to address the lack of women in positions of senior leadership by inspiring and encouraging more women to aim for the top.
CLP received almost 200 high-quality nominations, from across the UK. After much deliberation these were whittled down by the high-profile judging panel - made up of figures from the cultural and creative industries, the media and popular culture and chaired by Jenni Murray OBE, presenter of BBC Radio 4’s Woman’s Hour – to the final list of 50.
Jenni Murray, said: “I speak for the whole judging panel when I say that arriving at a final list from such a high quality and quantity of nominations was both a delight and a challenge. While we are obviously celebrating the achievements of outstanding individuals, it is also important to see these women as a collective force and as representative of women’s potential to reach the top of their game within this, and any other, sector. Congratulations and watch this space!”
More information on Women to Watch can be found at: www.culturalleadership.org.uk/w2w
Posted by: Peter
Links: Designers, Editorial, Talks
5th January 2010
Sophie guest edits for D&AD.

Sophie was invited by D&AD to contribute to its recent thought-piece series for London’s Metro daily paper. The series have been highlighting a weekly guest editor’s choice of design or product where interesting, and in this case sustainable things are happening.
Sophie chose to showcase the super smart and innovative company ‘Worn Again’ founded by Cyndi Rhoades and focused on their new range designed by Christopher Raeburn. The raw materials for this range come from deconstructed Eurostar uniforms and decommissioned Virgin parachutes. This collaboration between D&AD and Metro aims to get readers talking about creativity and to give them insight into what makes good design.
Read the piece here: http://dandad.typepad.com/dandad/ and in today’s Metro on your tube journey (remembering to recycle it after you have read it!)
Posted by: Sophie
Links: Advertising, Editorial, Green, Sustainability, Talks
9th December 2009
Last week’s Greenpeace newsletter had another one of their arresting headlines: “Activists are stopping climate destruction now! Early today 13 activists locked down cranes at one of the largest pulp and paper mills in the world.” With the UK still being a major importer of illegal timber and the global pulp and paper industry in the top 5 polluters, we cannot shrug off our industry’s part in this story.
Let’s look at the impact of print and no better place to start than with paper. No matter what your paper choice is, this will be a big chunk of the footprint for your piece of print.
Currently the overwhelming trend in sustainable print design is in specifying FSC (Forestry Stewardship Council, www.fsc.org)-accredited papers. This is miles better than a virgin stock (a paper stock with no recycled content) where there is no record of where the wood pulp has originated from – as is being highlighted by the Greenpeace campaign. What this ‘chain of custody’ system does not reflect is the carbon impact of paper, which is important when some FSC pulps are shipped from places like Brazil and ends up being a sizeable chunk of your print’s carbon footprint. By choosing a post-consumer recycled paper stock you can bring down your carbon footprint from between 30% up to a whopping 70%. Imagine the size of the Daily Mirror’s footprint if their newsprint wasn’t from a recycled stock sourced in the UK.
With this in mind it was interesting but ultimately disappointing to read in last week’s Printweek environmental newsletter that the paper company UPM will be supplying 9 million sheets of copy paper to the United Nation’s Climate Change talks in Copenhagen. My disappointment does not come from the choice of company; UPM’s credentials have rigorous environmental targets. My dismay originates from the type of paper chosen. UPM’s ‘Future’ grade (with a strapline that states ‘the best future ever’) seems to have good creds when it comes to chain of custody, including FSC, PEFC and the EU Eco-labels so no wood pulp from Indonesia. But why, when the eyes of the world watch and scrutinise this conference, would you default back to a virgin paper stock? Surely this would be one place where we could exemplify the great qualities of a paper that has been out in the world before and has returned as a new white (though maybe not ultra blue-white) stock, ready to be recycled into a new stock again. And following this how satisfying would it be to receive a piece of paper knowing that it had been recycled from the past papers of this conference, that had fulfilled its work relaying all the important information with clarity and when it had done its task had been recycled and remade ready for its next important job. Future paper’s specification is literally blinding – “an ultra-smooth, high-white paper for accurate and dazzling colour reproduction” with as far as I can see not a jot of recycled content contained within it.
Here at t.m we are continuously amazed how some of our more enlightened clients that boast extensive environmental management policies do not extend such regulations through to their marketing and print. It may seem to be a small issue swimming among the bigger fish but it’s the one that most will see. It must, more than anything, set the sustainable benchmark as a standard and show that companies hold true to their environmental ambitions even through to their choice of paper.
Knowing what I do about the energy cost of virgin paper and the potential saving from using a post-consumer stock, and adding concern by campaign groups like Greenpeace, I wonder what kind of message they are sending with this choice. I imagine there are other economics involved here as 9 million A4 sheets constitutes a lot of paper (and water – an average sheet of A4 paper can contain up to 10 litres of the stuff), but is it really crucial to have such a high specification?
In the end it seems to come down to why whiteness is so important. I am left wondering if this paper was chosen as part of a secret plan that renders the conference delegates so blinded by the frightening statistics printed on this ultra white paper stock that they are moved to take immediate and drastic action to halt global melt down. I hope so.
Posted by: Sophie
Links: Editorial, Events, Green, Papers, Sustainability